Comments on: The future of custom-built small websites http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites/ A weblog by Richard Cyganiak Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:16:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: phil jones http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites/#comment-9011 phil jones Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:58:05 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites#comment-9011 But imagine if it could be Ning for writing and hosting the PHP glue ... ;-) Of course, personally, I'm totally with Maggi on the Python thing. Just downloaded TurboGears and seriously thinking of doing *something* with it. But imagine if it could be Ning for writing and hosting the PHP glue … ;-)

Of course, personally, I’m totally with Maggi on the Python thing. Just downloaded TurboGears and seriously thinking of doing *something* with it.

]]> By: Common Sense » How to build a website2.0 http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites/#comment-9010 Common Sense » How to build a website2.0 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:39:04 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites#comment-9010 [...] ThMe future of custom-built small websites How To Build a Website with Office 2.0 [...] [...] ThMe future of custom-built small websites How To Build a Website with Office 2.0 [...]

]]> By: Richard Cyganiak http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites/#comment-8990 Richard Cyganiak Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:41:46 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites#comment-8990 Yes, I think that PHP has already won as the language for the “main platform”. It is deeply entrenched in the “download some script and hack around until it does what I want” area of web development, it is easy to learn, there's a huge developer base, and with a plugin architecture network effects kick in. It's a bit sad, but Python and Ruby will stay niche solutions in this area. Many of the Web 2.0 apps driving this whole process are implemented in these languages though. Yes, I think that PHP has already won as the language for the “main platform”. It is deeply entrenched in the “download some script and hack around until it does what I want” area of web development, it is easy to learn, there’s a huge developer base, and with a plugin architecture network effects kick in. It’s a bit sad, but Python and Ruby will stay niche solutions in this area.

Many of the Web 2.0 apps driving this whole process are implemented in these languages though.

]]> By: Maggi http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites/#comment-8987 Maggi Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:30:10 +0000 http://dowhatimean.net/2006/07/the-future-of-custom-built-small-websites#comment-8987 A rather depressing thought, this means the whole Web 2.0 community will be stuck with PHP. Dang it. Where is the developer to stand and create a similar plugin-based CMS using Python? Ore maybe Ruby? A rather depressing thought, this means the whole Web 2.0 community will be stuck with PHP. Dang it. Where is the developer to stand and create a similar plugin-based CMS using Python? Ore maybe Ruby?

]]>