<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Any opinions on BibSonomy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/</link>
	<description>A weblog by Richard Cyganiak</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:16:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/#comment-213873</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dowhatimean.net/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy#comment-213873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://bibsonomy.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bibsonomy&lt;/a&gt; all the time, love it. I&#039;m definitely looking forward to more screen scraping though, and more export options. One thing that might make bibsonomy attract more users fast is if they added something like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ottobib.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ottobib&lt;/a&gt; export options; if you can convince a first-year student that this site will give you a quick and simple reference list for pasting into your Word document, in APA style and everything, then you&#039;ve got it sold. Right now, bibsonomy is great for geeks, but not so much for everyone else.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I tried Zotero, but since I use Opera and not Firefox it seemed rather pointless (also, I hate having slow extensions running constantly, when I only use them for five minutes at a time -- maybe Zotero&#039;s better suited for site-specific browsers). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding copyright; I&#039;m pretty sure that the pdf&#039;s you upload can only be read by you, so it&#039;s basically like having it on your private email account / drive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use <a href="http://bibsonomy.org/" rel="nofollow">bibsonomy</a> all the time, love it. I&#8217;m definitely looking forward to more screen scraping though, and more export options. One thing that might make bibsonomy attract more users fast is if they added something like the <a href="http://www.ottobib.com/" rel="nofollow">ottobib</a> export options; if you can convince a first-year student that this site will give you a quick and simple reference list for pasting into your Word document, in APA style and everything, then you&#8217;ve got it sold. Right now, bibsonomy is great for geeks, but not so much for everyone else.</p>
<p>I tried Zotero, but since I use Opera and not Firefox it seemed rather pointless (also, I hate having slow extensions running constantly, when I only use them for five minutes at a time &#8212; maybe Zotero&#8217;s better suited for site-specific browsers). </p>
<p>Regarding copyright; I&#8217;m pretty sure that the pdf&#8217;s you upload can only be read by you, so it&#8217;s basically like having it on your private email account / drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/#comment-12370</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dowhatimean.net/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy#comment-12370</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;m one of the BibSonomy team I will not make too much advertisement for the system. I will only point you to some new stuff which is related to the comments. First we started with the development of screen scrapers. Currently we support ACM, CiteSeer, http://arxiv.org/, and the library of the University of Karlsruhe. We will add more supported sites in the future. We are now working on a new/extented version of the system which will include a rest api. Via this api the JabRef tool will be connected. A prototype of the api and JabRef is up but I can not tell you any date when we can release it. Any feedback is very welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;m one of the BibSonomy team I will not make too much advertisement for the system. I will only point you to some new stuff which is related to the comments. First we started with the development of screen scrapers. Currently we support ACM, CiteSeer, <a href="http://arxiv.org/" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/</a>, and the library of the University of Karlsruhe. We will add more supported sites in the future. We are now working on a new/extented version of the system which will include a rest api. Via this api the JabRef tool will be connected. A prototype of the api and JabRef is up but I can not tell you any date when we can release it. Any feedback is very welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leobard</title>
		<link>http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/#comment-12029</link>
		<dc:creator>leobard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dowhatimean.net/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy#comment-12029</guid>
		<description>Gunnar is using Bibsonomy. I have an account. We use it for some professional stuff in Nepomuk (managing Bibtex in a group).

For bookmarks, its also nice.

You would install semantic mediawiki on this server at dowhatimean.net or on your desktop? (if its desktop, I know this system that...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunnar is using Bibsonomy. I have an account. We use it for some professional stuff in Nepomuk (managing Bibtex in a group).</p>
<p>For bookmarks, its also nice.</p>
<p>You would install semantic mediawiki on this server at dowhatimean.net or on your desktop? (if its desktop, I know this system that&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MUslar</title>
		<link>http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/#comment-11990</link>
		<dc:creator>MUslar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dowhatimean.net/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy#comment-11990</guid>
		<description>I prefer bibsonomy to connotea and citeulike because of the content - it is more computer science related, more tags are available and more interesting papers. However, it is often a bit strange loading all my papers on their server - are there any copyright problems when submitting IEEE papers or something similar? On the other hand, it&#039;s great to have everything available on the web- I used to work with JabRef using a custom export, grouping and my own webserver - now it is much more convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer bibsonomy to connotea and citeulike because of the content &#8211; it is more computer science related, more tags are available and more interesting papers. However, it is often a bit strange loading all my papers on their server &#8211; are there any copyright problems when submitting IEEE papers or something similar? On the other hand, it&#8217;s great to have everything available on the web- I used to work with JabRef using a custom export, grouping and my own webserver &#8211; now it is much more convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jahrynx</title>
		<link>http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy/#comment-11979</link>
		<dc:creator>jahrynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dowhatimean.net/2006/10/any-opinions-on-bibsonomy#comment-11979</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t know BibSonomy, I may take a look, thanks for the entry. You may also be interrested by http://www.citeulike.org which does the same. A feature i like and that i think bibsonomy miss is the possibility to post a copy of the pdf/ps to the site, so you can access it from everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know BibSonomy, I may take a look, thanks for the entry. You may also be interrested by <a href="http://www.citeulike.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.citeulike.org</a> which does the same. A feature i like and that i think bibsonomy miss is the possibility to post a copy of the pdf/ps to the site, so you can access it from everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: richard.cyganiak.de @ 2012-02-09 15:45:12 -->
